Demographic study of major conferences in heavy ion physics

Authors

  • Christine Nattrass University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Carlota Andres CPHT, CNRS, École polytechnique
  • Ron Belmont University of North Carolina at Greensboro
  • Jennifer Blue Miami University
  • Geraldine L. Cochran Rutgers University
  • Megan Connors Georgia State University
  • Justin Frantz Ohio University
  • Debora Mroczek University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Jacquelyn Noronha-Hostler University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Stacyann Nelson Howard University
  • Rosi Reed Lehigh University
  • Sevil Salur Rutgers University
  • Natasha Sharma Indian Institute of Science Education and Research
  • Patrick Patrick Steffanic University of Tennessee
  • Deepa Thomas The University of Texas at Austin
  • Zhenyu Ye University of Illinois at Chicago

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31349/SuplRevMexFis.3.040922

Abstract

We present a study of the demographics of major conferences in heavy ion physics. We look at the distribution of talks by gender for Quark Matter, Strangeness in Quark Matter, Initial Stages, and Hard Probes between 2011–2022. We find that women are often underrepresented among plenary speakers and usually underrepresented among parallel speakers. At Quark Matter, women are more likely to be given a poster presentation in lieu of an oral presentation. The Quark Matter summary talk has never been given by a woman. We discuss the collection of data and possible approaches to make the field more equitable and, therefore, more scientifically productive.

References

J. Perkel, Just say "no" to Manels (2020), URL https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/say-no-to-manels-all-male-panels-research-science-conference.

A. Prasad, Diversity Calculator, URL http://aanandprasad.com/diversity-calculator/.

G. Baym, Ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions: the first billion seconds (2015), URL https://indico.cern.ch/event/355454/contributions/838751/attachments/1157009/1677442/BAM-QM2015F.pdf.

C. L. Exley and J. B. Kessler, The Gender Gap in SelfPromotion, Working Paper 26345, National Bureau of Economic Research (2019), 10.3386/w26345, URL http://www.nber.org/papers/w26345.

M. J. Liberatore and W. P. Wagner, Gender, Performance, and Self-Efficacy: A Quasi-Experimental Field Study, Journal of Computer Information Systems 62 (2022) 109, 10.1080/08874417.2020.1717397

E. Hengel, Publishing while Female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1753, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge (2017), URL https://ideas.repec.org/p/cam/camdae/1753.html.

M. B. Ross, et al., Women are Credited Less in Science than are Men, Nature (2022), 10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w

A. E. Budden, et al., Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23 (2008) 4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.008

I. N. Reid, Gender-Correlated Systematics in HST Proposal Selection, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 126 (2014) 923, 10.1086/678964

M. E. Heilman, The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 26 (1980) 386, https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(80)90074-4

Downloads

Published

2022-12-10

How to Cite

1.
Nattrass C, Andres C, Belmont R, Blue J, Cochran GL, Connors M, Frantz J, Mroczek D, Noronha-Hostler J, Nelson S, Reed R, Salur S, Sharma N, Patrick Steffanic P, Thomas D, Ye Z. Demographic study of major conferences in heavy ion physics. Supl. Rev. Mex. Fis. [Internet]. 2022 Dec. 10 [cited 2023 Feb. 6];3(4):040922 1-7. Available from: https://rmf.smf.mx/ojs/index.php/rmf-s/article/view/6844