Latest results of the ALICE Collaboration and plans for ALICE 3

Authors

  • A. Marin ALICE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31349/SuplRevMexFis.4.021106

Keywords:

QGP, heavy-ion, LHC, ALICE, ALICE 3

Abstract

The ALICE experiment is devoted to the study of the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) created in heavy-ion collisions at the CERN LHC. The experimental setup allows for the study of many different observables that contributed to the characterization of the properties of the QGP. The ALICE experiment went through a major upgrade during LS2 to profit from the increased LHC luminosity and to improve the tracking resolution. An additional upgrade is planned for LS3. A new experiment, ALICE 3, was proposed as next major upgrade in LS4. In this contribution, a selection of recent physics results was presented together with a glimpse of the next upgrades during LS3 and LS4, with the main focus on ALICE 3 and its physics program

References

K. Aamodt et al., The ALICE experiment at the CERN LHC, JINST 3 (2008) S08002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08002

B. Abelev et al., Performance of the ALICE Experiment at the CERN LHC, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A29 (2014) 1430044, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X14300440

The ALICE experiment – A journey through QCD (2022), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.04384

J. Adam et al., Centrality Dependence of the Charged-Particle Multiplicity Density at Midrapidity in Pb-Pb Collisions at √ sNN = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 222302, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.222302

S. Acharya et al., Production of charged pions, kaons, and (anti-)protons in Pb-Pb and inelastic pp collisions at √ sNN = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 101 (2020) 044907, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.044907

S. Acharya et al., Multiplicity dependence of π, K, and p production in pp collisions at √ s = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 693, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8125-1

J. Adam et al., Enhanced production of multi-strange hadrons in high-multiplicity proton-proton collisions, Nature Phys. 13 (2017) 535, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4111

Anisotropic flow and flow fluctuations of identified hadrons in Pb−Pb collisions at √ sNN = 5.02 TeV (2022), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.04587

J. E. Bernhard, J. S. Moreland, and S. A. Bass, Bayesian estimation of the specific shear and bulk viscosity of quark–gluon plasma, Nature Phys. 15 (2019) 1113, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0611-8

D. Everett et al., Multisystem Bayesian constraints on the transport coefficients of QCD matter, Phys. Rev. C 103 (2021) 054904, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.054904

Elliptic flow of charged particles at midrapidity relative to the spectator plane in Pb-Pb and Xe-Xe collisions (2022), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.10240

S. Gavin and M. Abdel-Aziz, Measuring Shear Viscosity Using Transverse Momentum Correlations in Relativistic Nuclear Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 162302, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.162302

M. Sharma and C. A. Pruneau, Methods for the Study of Transverse Momentum Differential Correlations, Phys. Rev. C 79 (2009) 024905, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.024905

H. Agakishiev et al., Evolution of the differential transverse momentum correlation function with centrality in Au+Au collisions at √ sNN = 200 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 704 (2011) 467, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2011.09.075

S. Acharya et al., Longitudinal and azimuthal evolution of two-particle transverse momentum correlations in Pb-Pb collisions at √ sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 804 (2020) 135375, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135375

Two-particle transverse momentum correlations in pp and pPb collisions at LHC energies (2022), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.08979

V. Gonzalez, et al., Extraction of the specific shear viscosity of quark-gluon plasma from two-particle transverse momentum correlations, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 465, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s10052-021-09260-z

R. Rapp, Dilepton Spectroscopy of QCD Matter at Collider Energies, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013 (2013) 148253, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/148253

T. Song, et al., Open charm and dileptons from relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 97 (2018) 064907, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.064907

S. Acharya et al., Measurement of electrons from semileptonic heavy-flavour hadron decays at midrapidity in pp and PbPb collisions at √ sNN = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 804 (2020) 135377, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135377

S. Acharya et al., Direct photon production at low transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at √ s = 2.76 and 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. C99 (2019) 024912, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 99.024912

C. Gale, et al., Multimessenger heavy-ion collision physics, Phys. Rev. C 105 (2022) 014909, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.014909

H. van Hees, M. He, and R. Rapp, Pseudo-critical enhancement of thermal photons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions?, Nucl. Phys. A933 (2015) 256, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.09.009

J.-F. Paquet, et al., Production of photons in relativistic heavyion collisions, Phys. Rev. C93 (2016) 044906, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.044906

R. Chatterjee, et al., Collision centrality and τ0 dependence of the emission of thermal photons from fluctuating initial state in ideal hydrodynamic calculation, Phys. Rev. C85 (2012) 064910, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.064910

R. Chatterjee, L. Bhattacharya, and D. K. Srivastava, Electromagnetic probes, Lect. Notes Phys. 785 (2010) 219, https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-642-02286-9_7

O. Linnyk, et al., Hadronic and partonic sources of direct photons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C92 (2015) 054914, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.054914

M. He, R. J. Fries, and R. Rapp, Ideal Hydrodynamics for Bulk and Multistrange Hadrons in √ sNN =200 AGeV Au-Au Collisions, Phys. Rev. C85 (2012) 044911, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.044911

N. P. M. Holt, P. M. Hohler, and R. Rapp, Thermal photon emission from the πρω system, Nucl. Phys. A945 (2016) 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.09.008

M. Heffernan, P. Hohler, and R. Rapp, Universal Parametrization of Thermal Photon Rates in Hadronic Matter, Phys. Rev. C91 (2015) 027902, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.027902

S. Turbide, R. Rapp, and C. Gale, Hadronic production of thermal photons, Phys. Rev. C69 (2004) 014903, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.69.014903

T. Matsui and H. Satz, J/ψ Suppression by Quark-Gluon Plasma Formation, Phys. Lett. B 178 (1986) 416, https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0370-2693(86)91404-8

S. Acharya et al., Measurements of inclusive J/ψ production at midrapidity and forward rapidity in Pb−Pb collisions at √ sNN = 5.02 TeV (2023), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.13361

A. Andronic, et al., Transverse momentum distributions of charmonium states with the statistical hadronization model, Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019) 134836, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134836

X. Du and R. Rapp, Sequential Regeneration of Charmonia in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Nucl. Phys. A 943 (2015) 147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.09.006

P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Stachel, (Non)thermal aspects of charmonium production and a new look at J / psi suppression, Phys. Lett. B 490 (2000) 196, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(00) 00991-6

R. L. Thews, M. Schroedter, and J. Rafelski, Enhanced J/ψ production in deconfined quark matter, Phys. Rev. C 63 (2001) 054905, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.63.054905

P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Stachel, The quest for the quark-gluon plasma, Nature 448 (2007) 302, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06080

ψ(2S) suppression in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC (2022), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.08893

S. Acharya et al., Prompt D0 , D+, and D∗+ production in Pb–Pb collisions at √ sNN = 5.02 TeV, JHEP 01 (2022) 174, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2022)174

Measurement of the radius dependence of charged-particle jet suppression in Pb-Pb collisions at √ sNN = 5.02 TeV (2023), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.00592

Z. Citron et al., Report from Working Group 5: Future physics opportunities for high-density QCD at the LHC with heavy-ion and proton beams, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7 (2019) 1159, https://doi.org/10.23731/CYRM-2019-007.1159

ALICE upgrades during the LHC Long Shutdown 2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.01238

Letter of Intent: A Forward Calorimeter (FoCal) in the ALICE experiment, Tech. rep., CERN, Geneva (2020), URL https://cds.cern.ch/record/2719928

L. Musa, Letter of Intent for an ALICE ITS Upgrade in LS3, Tech. rep., CERN, Geneva (2019), https://doi.org/10.17181/ CERN-LHCC-2019-018, URL https://cds.cern. ch/record/2703140

D. Adamová et al., A next-generation LHC heavy-ion experiment (2019), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1902.01211

Letter of intent for ALICE 3: A next-generation heavy-ion experiment at the LHC (2022), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.02491

P. M. Hohler and R. Rapp, Is ρ-Meson Melting Compatible with Chiral Restoration?, Phys. Lett. B 731 (2014) 103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.02.021

A. Rothkopf, Heavy Quarkonium in Extreme Conditions, Phys. Rept. 858 (2020) 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.02. 006

Downloads

Published

2023-09-18

How to Cite

1.
Marin A. Latest results of the ALICE Collaboration and plans for ALICE 3. Supl. Rev. Mex. Fis. [Internet]. 2023 Sep. 18 [cited 2024 May 28];4(2):021106 1-10. Available from: https://rmf.smf.mx/ojs/index.php/rmf-s/article/view/7191