Intrinsic time resolution and efficiency study for simulated scintillators plastics with Geant4

Authors

  • Edmundo Márquez Quintos Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla
  • Cristian Heber Zepeda Fernández CONACyT
  • Lucio Fidel Rebolledo Herrera Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla
  • Eduardo Moreno Barbosa Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFis.69.040901

Keywords:

Time resolution, Photosensor, Plastic scintillator, Optical photons

Abstract

The time resolution (TR) is one of the most important characteristic of a detector. The particular case of a scintillator, the collection of light also is important, it depends of the sensitive area of the photo-sensor (Scorer). Normally, the Scorer of Photomultipliers Tubes (PMTs) is greater than the Scorer of Silicon Photomultipliers (SiPMs). Other differences are the voltage of operation, their size and cost, in some cases, the large size of PMTs can be difficult to place, if small space is required, in which case, it is preferable to use SiPMs. The value of TR also depends of the size and geometry of the
scintillator, number of photo-sensors and the electronic part.
In this work, we study the mean optical photon arrival time distribution (AT) to a Scorer from a SiPM of 6X6 mm2. We define the variation of AT as the intrinsic time resolution (ITR). In Geant4, we simulated two different geometries: square and hexagonal, for a BC-404 plastic scintillator coupled to one Scorer. The sources simulated were Sr90, Co60, Cs137, Na22 and μ- of 1 GeV. It is shown that AT and ITR depends of the geometry and size of the plastic scintillator, the location of the Scorer, the incident particle and its energy. Then, the ITR and therefore the TR is not a constant for a detector. Finally, we show the relation between AT and the deposited energy by the particle incident, which are related in the experiment to the response time event of the detector and the deposited charge by the incident particle, respectively.

Author Biographies

Cristian Heber Zepeda Fernández, CONACyT

Departamento de física médica, Cátedra CONACyT.

Lucio Fidel Rebolledo Herrera, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

Departamendo de Física Médica

Eduardo Moreno Barbosa, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

Departamento de Física médica

References

M. Alvarado et al., A beam-beam monitoring detector for the MPD experiment at NICA, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 953 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2019.163150.

R. Acevedo Kado et al., The conceptual design of the miniBeBe detector proposed for NICA-MPD JINST 16 (2021) P02002.

V. Golovatyuk, V. Kekelidze, V. Kolesnikov, O. Rogachevsky, A. Sorin, The Multi-Purpose Detector (MPD) of the collider experiment, Eur.Phys. J. A52 (2016) 212, https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16212-1.

E. Garutti, Silicon Photomultipliers for High Energy Physics Detectors, JINST 6 C10003 [arXiv:1108.3166].

F. Simon, Silicon Photomultipliers in Particle and Nuclear Physics, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 926 (2019) 85, [arXiv: 1811.03877].

K.E. Kuper, V.P. Oleynikov, V.V. Porosev, G.A. Savinov and W. Drozdowski, On reachable energy resolution of SiPM based scintillation counters for X-ray detection, JINST 12 (2017) P01001.

SensL Technologies Ltd., Product Selection Guide (2013), http://sensl.com/products.

C. H. Zepeda-Fernandez et al., Electric charge estimation using a SensL SiPM JINST 15 (2020) P09008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/P09008.

E. Ebru and C. Celiktas, Effects of the positions of scintillation detectors with fast scintillators and photomultiplier tubes on TOF-PET performance, Pramana 94 (2020) 27.

W. Krzemien et al., A novel TOF-PET detector based on plastic scintillators, IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Med. Imag. Conf. (NSS/MIC) 2015 (2015) 1.

L. Raczynski, Reconstruction of signal in plastic scintillator of PET using Tikhonov regularization, IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Ann. Int. Conf. 2015 (2015) 1.

A. Wieczorek et al., Novel scintillating material 2-(4- styrylphenyl)benzoxazole for the fully digital and MRI compatible J-PET tomograph based on plastic scintillators, PLoS One 12 (2017) e0186728.

R. Ghadiri and J. Khorsandi Studying the response of a plastic scintillator to gamma rays using the Geant4 Monte Carlo code Applied Radiation and Isotopes 99 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.02.017.

U. Zafar, Light output simulation of LYSO single crystal. arXiv:1305.3010[physics.ins-det] 99 (2015).

E Leming et al., A GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulation to describe the time response of a coupled SiPM and LYSO detection system. JINST 9 (2014) C06008

Xi Daoming et al., Optimization of the SiPM Pixel Size for a Monolithic PET Detector. Physics Procedia 37 (2012).

W. Joshua, Cates and Craig S Levin Evaluation of a clinical TOF-PET detector design that achieves ≤100 ps coincidence time resolution Phys. Med. Biol. 63 (2018) 11.

N. Otte et al., The SiPM - A new Photon Detector for PET, Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 150 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.08.048.

GEANT collaboration, Geant4 User’s Guide for Application Developers, GEANT4 10.7 ed (2020).

C. Saint-Gobain, BC400 BC404 BC408 BC412 BC416 Data Sheet (2018).

A. Wieczorek, Development of novel plastic scintillators based on polyvinyltoluene for the hybrid J-PET/MR tomograph (2017).

S. Korpachev, and M. Chadeeva, Geant4 simulation of optical photon transport in scintillator tile with direct readout by silicon photomultiplier (2017).

Berkeley Nucleonics Corp Radioactive Check Sources Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Mixed Isotopes https://www.berkeleynucleonics.com/check-source.

Stanford Environmental Safe & safety Na-22 Radionuclide Fact Sheet. https://ehs.stanford.edu/reference/na-22-radionuclide-fact-sheet.

Stanford Environmental Safe & safety Cs-137 Radionuclide Fact Sheet. https://ehs.stanford.edu/reference/cs-137-radionuclide-fact-sheet.

Stanford Environmental Safe & safety Co-60 Radionuclide Fact Sheet. https://ehs.stanford.edu/reference/co-60-radionuclide-fact-sheet.

Stanford Environmental Safe & safety Sr-90 Radionuclide Fact Sheet. https://ehs.stanford.edu/reference/sr-90-radionuclide-fact-sheet.

S.-G. Crystals, LYSO Scintillfigureation MAterial Lu1.8Y.2SiO5:Ce 2017.

C. H. Zepeda Fernandez, Time Resolution Simulation Measurement for the Configuration Plastic Scintillator Material+SiPM and its Application to Medical Physics, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 540 (2020) 012031.

T. Sui, Z. Zhao, S. Xie, Q. Huang, J. Xu and Q. Peng, PicoTDC: a novel FPGA-based TDC with 2.2ps RMS timing resolution. 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC) 2017 10.1109/NSSMIC. 2017.8532955

Ayala-Torres et al., Performance of BeBe, a proposed dedicated beam-beam monitoring detector for the MPD-NICA experiment at JINR, Journal of Instrumentation 17 (2022) P09031.

Niedzwiecki et al., J-PET: a new technology for the wholebody PET imaging, Acta Phys. Polon. B 48 (2017).

Downloads

Published

2023-07-04

How to Cite

[1]
E. Márquez Quintos, C. H. Zepeda Fernández, L. F. Rebolledo Herrera, and E. Moreno Barbosa, “Intrinsic time resolution and efficiency study for simulated scintillators plastics with Geant4”, Rev. Mex. Fís., vol. 69, no. 4 Jul-Aug, pp. 040901 1–, Jul. 2023.