Investigating the effects of numerical algorithms on global magnetohydrodynamics simulations of solar wind in the inner heliosphere

Authors

  • L. A. de León Alanís Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
  • José Juan González Avilés 4432274870 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0150-9418
  • P. Riley Predictive Science Inc.
  • M. Ben-Nun Predictive Science Inc.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFis.70.031501

Keywords:

Solar wind; magnetohydrodynamics; numerical methods; heliosphere

Abstract

This paper explores the effects of numerical algorithms on global magnetohydrodynamics simulations of solar wind (SW) in the inner heliosphere. To do so, we use sunRunner3D, a 3-D magnetohydrodynamics model that employs the boundary conditions generated by CORHEL and the PLUTO code to compute the plasma properties of the SW with the ideal magnetohydrodynamics approximation up to 1.1 AU in the inner heliosphere. Mainly, we define three different combinations of numerical algorithms based on their diffusion level. This diffusion level is related to the way of solving the magnetohydrodynamics equations using the finite volume formulation, and, therefore, we set in terms of the divergence-free condition methods, Riemann solvers, variable reconstruction schemes, limiters, and time-steeping algorithms. According to the simulation results, we demonstrate that sunRunner3D reproduces global features of Corotating Interaction Regions observed by Earth-based spacecraft for a set of Carrington rotations that cover a period that lays in the late declining phase of solar cycle 24, independently of the numerical algorithms. Moreover, statistical analyses between models and in-situ measurements show reasonable agreement with the observations, and remarkably, the high diffusive method matches better with in-situ data than low diffusive methods.

Author Biography

José Juan González Avilés, 4432274870

I obtained the Doctor of Science degree in Physics with an honorable mention from the “Instituto de Física y Matemáticas” of the “Universidad Michoacana San Nicolás de Hidalgo” in 2017. I spent two years as a postdoctoral research experience at the Institute of Geophysics, Michoacán Unit of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). My main research areas focus on implementing 3D numerical codes for solar magnetohydrodynamics and space weather studies. I worked as a CONAHCYT Research Fellow at the Mexico Space Weather Service (SCiESMEX), part of the National Space Weather Laboratory (LANCE) of the Institute of Geophysics, Michoacán Unit of the UNAM. I am an Assistant Professor at the School of Higher Studies, UNAM, in Morelia. In 2017, I received the Weizmann Prize for the best doctoral thesis in Exact Sciences in Mexico; Furthermore, I am level 1 of the National System of Researchers (SNI).

References

P. Riley, J. A. Linker, and Z. Mikic, An empirically-driven global MHD model of the solar corona and inner heliosphere, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 106 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JA000121

D. Odstrcil, Modeling 3-D solar wind structure, Advances in Space Research 32 (2003) 497, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00332-6

G. Tóth et al., Space Weather Modeling Framework: A new tool for the space science community, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 110 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011126

X. Feng et al., Three-Dimensional Solar Wind Modeling from The Sun to Earth by a SIP-CESE MHD Model with a Six-Component Grid, The Astrophysical Journal 723 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/723/1/300

D. Shiota et al., Inner heliosphere MHD modeling system applicable to space weather forecasting for the other planets, Space Weather 12 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1002/2013SW000989

J. Pomoell and S. Poedts, EUHFORIA: European heliospheric forecasting information asset, J. Space Weather Space Clim. 8 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2018020

P. Mayank, B. Vaidya, and D. Chakrabarty, SWASTi-SW: Space Weather Adaptive Simulation Framework for Solar Wind and Its Relevance to the Aditya-L1 Mission, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 262 (2022), https://doi.org/10.3847/2741538-4365/ac8551

M. L. Goldstein, D. A. Roberts, and W. Matthaeus, Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence in the solar wind, Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics 33 (1995) 283, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.873680

C. Wang et al., Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) numerical simulations on the interaction of the solar wind with the magnetosphere: A review, Science China Earth Sciences 56 (2013) 1141, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-013-4608-3

T. Ogino, A three-dimensional MHD simulation of the interaction of the solar wind with the Earth’s magnetosphere: The genera280 tion of field-aligned currents, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 91 (1986) 6791, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA091iA06p06791

W.-H. Ip and A. Kopp, MHD simulations of the solar wind interaction with Mercury, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 107 (2002) SSH, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA009171

R. J. Walker, T. Ogino, and M. G. Kivelson, Magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the effects of the solar wind on the Jovian magneto sphere, Planetary and Space Science 49 (2001) 237, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(00)00145-8

T. Baratashvili et al., Exploring the effects of numerical methods and slope limiters in heliospheric modeling, Sun and Geosphere 15 (2023) 49, https://doi.org/10.31401/SunGeo.2022.02.01

M. Zhang and X. Feng, A comparative study of divergence cleaning methods of magnetic field in the solar coronal numerical simulation, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 3 (2016) 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2016.00006

P. Riley et al., Understanding the large-scale, three-dimensional structure of the 5th of September 2022 interplanetary coronal mass ejection through a new global MHD model, submitted to Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate (2023)

P. Riley and M. Ben-Nun, sunRunner1D: A Tool for Exploring ICME Evolution through the Inner Heliosphere, Universe 8 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8090447

J. J. González-Avilés et al., Using SunRunner3D to interpret the global structure of the heliosphere from in situ measurements, submitted to Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate (2023)

E. Aguilar-Rodriguez et al., Numerical MHD models of Stream Interaction Regions (SIRs) and Corotating Interaction Regions (CIRs) using sunRunner3D: Comparison with observations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 529 (2023) 1250, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae640

J. A. Linker et al., CORHEL: AModeling Suite for Describing the Solar Corona and Inner Heliosphere, In AGU FallMeeting Abstracts, 2009 (2009) SA43A-1612

A. Mignone, et al., PLUTO: A Numerical Code for Computational Astrophysics, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 170 (2007) 228, https://doi.org/10.1086/513316

J. A. Linker, et al., An Empirically Driven TimeDependentModel of the SolarWind, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 719 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/719/1/012012

P. Riley et al., Corotating interaction regions during the recent solar minimum: The power and limitations of global MHD modeling, Journal of Atmospheric and SolarTerrestrial Physics 83 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.12.013

Z. Mikic and J. A. Linker, The large-scale structure of the solar corona and inner heliosphere, In D.Winterhalter, et al., eds., Proceedings of the eigth International solar wind Conference: Solar wind eight, vol. 382 of American Institute of Physics Conference Series (1996) https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995sowi.conf...60M

Z. Mikic et al., Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of the global solar corona, Physics of Plasmas 6 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.873474

W. Kley, On the treatment of the Coriolis force in computational astrophysics, A& A 338 (1998) L37, https://doi-org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9808351

A. Mignone et al., A conservative orbital advection scheme for simulations of magnetized shear flows with the PLUTO code, A& A 545 (2012) A152, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219557

P. Roe, Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes, Journal of Computational Physics 43 (1981) 357, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5

M. Čada and M. Torrilhon, Compact third-order limiter functions for finite volume methods, Journal of Computational Physics 228 (2009) 4118, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.02.020

S. Li, An HLLC Riemann solver for magneto-hydrodynamics, Journal of Computational Physics 203 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2004.08.020

N. K. Yamaleev and M. H. Carpenter, A systematic methodology for constructing high-order energy stable WENO schemes, Journal of Computational Physics 228 (2009) 4248, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.03.002

H. Yee, Construction of explicit and implicit symmetric TVD schemes and their applications, Journal of Computational Physics 68 (1987) 151, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(87)90049-0

K. G. Powell, Approximate Riemann solver for magnetohydrodynamics (that works in more than one dimension) (1994), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60543-7 23

A. Dedner et al., Hyperbolic Divergence Cleaning for the MHD Equations, Journal of Computational Physics 175 (2002) 645, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2001.6961

T.Miyoshi and K. Kusano, A multi-state HLL approximate Riemann solver for ideal magnetohydrodynamics, Journal of Computational Physics 208 (2005) 315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2005.02.017

D. Stansby and P. Riley, PsiPy (2022), https://github.com/predsci/PsiPy

M. A. Reiss et al., Unifying the validation of ambient solar wind models, Advances in Space Research (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.05.026

Downloads

Published

2024-05-01

How to Cite

[1]
L. A. de León Alanís, J. J. González Avilés, P. Riley, and M. Ben-Nun, “Investigating the effects of numerical algorithms on global magnetohydrodynamics simulations of solar wind in the inner heliosphere”, Rev. Mex. Fís., vol. 70, no. 3 May-Jun, pp. 031501 1–, May 2024.