Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels in mammography: multicenter retrospective study in Trujillo, Peru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFis.72.041101Keywords:
Local diagnostic reference levels, mammography, radiation protection, average glandular dose, dose managementAbstract
Radiation exposure in mammography can vary considerably across centers, potentially affecting both diagnostic quality and patient safety. In Trujillo, Peru, no locally adjusted absorbed dose values were previously available. Therefore, the objective of this study was to establish local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) for digital mammography within the EsSalud hospital network (Social Health Insurance) in Trujillo. A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted in three hospitals, analyzing 133 digital mammograms acquired with Hologic Selenia Dimensions systems. Technical parameters such as kilovoltage, tube load, compression force, compressed breast thickness, and average glandular dose (AGD) were collected and processed using automated systems. The LDRLs, defined as the 75th percentile of the AGD distribution, were determined for the craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) projections. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of AGD. The proposed LDRLs were 1.78 mGy for CC and 2.12 mGy for MLO, values well below the reference level of 3 mGy recommended by the Basic Safety Standards of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and 30 − 39% lower than the regional LDRLs previously reported for direct digital radiography (DDR) systems in Latin America. Tube load (β = 0.886, p < 0.001 for CC; β = 0.572, p < 0.001 for MLO) and compressed breast thickness (β = 0.193, p < 0.001 for CC; β = 0.297, p = 0.001 for MLO) were identified as the most significant technical predictors of AGD. The established LDRLs demonstrate optimized dosimetric practices within the EsSalud network in Trujillo, ensuring that patient doses are appropriate, consistent, and aligned with international standards. Their implementation will facilitate ongoing dose monitoring, protocol standardization, and the strengthening of radiation protection in breast cancer screening programs.
Downloads
References
D. Odongo et al., National diagnostic reference levels for digital diagnostic and screening mammography in Uganda, PLOS ONE 19 (2024) 12, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294541
J. Damilakis et al., How to establish and use local diagnostic reference levels: an ESR EuroSafe Imaging expert statement, Insights Imaging 14 (2023) 27, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01369-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01369-x
E. Dzidzornu et al., Mammography Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) in Ghana, Radiography 27 (2021) 611, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.11.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.11.022
Q. Liu et al., Diagnostic reference levels in digital mammography: a systematic review, Journal of Radiological Protection 42 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac4214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac4214
ICRP, The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, 37 (2007) 103
European Commission, Radiation Protection No. 180: Medical Radiation Exposure of the European Population (European Commission, Brussels, 2014)
M. Vera Moreno, Estimación de niveles de referencia de dosis a pacientes en estudios mamográficos y su relación con el espesor de la mama comprimida, Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, España (2021)
N. K. Abdulwahid et al., Estimating local diagnostic reference levels for mammography in Dubai, Diagnostics 14 (2023) 8, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14010008
Ministerio de Salud del Perú (MINSA), Guía de Práctica Clínica para el Tamizaje de Cáncer de Mama en el Primer Nivel de Atención, Tech. rep., MINSA, Lima, Peru (2024)
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (INEI), La Libertad: Resultados definitivos de los Censos Nacionales 2017, Tech. rep., INEI, La Libertad, Perú (2018)
D. R. Dance et al., Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol, Physics in Medicine and Biology 45 (2000) 3225, https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/308
Instituto Peruano de Energía Nuclear (IPEN), Norma Técnica IR.003.2013: Requisitos de Protección Radiológica en Diagnóstico Médico con Rayos X, Tech. Rep. R.P. 123-13- IPEN/PRES, IPEN, Lima, Perú (2013)
F. Díaz Henao, Determinación de niveles de referencia en procedimientos de mamografía digital tomosíntesis, Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia (2020), https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/77555
IAEA, Establecimiento de niveles orientativos en radiografía general y mamografía, IAEA-TECDOC-1646, ARCAL LXXV- IAEA RLA/9/048, Vienna, Austria (2010)
P. Mora et al., Latin American dose survey results in mammography studies under IAEA programme: radiological protection of patients in medical exposures (TSA3), Radiation Protection Dosimetry 163 (2015) 473, https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu205
International Atomic Energy Agency, International Basic Safety Standards for Protection Against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources, Safety Series No. 115 (International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, 1996)
H. I. Sánchez Mendoza et al., Establishing mammography diagnostic reference levels in Mexico: A step towards improving patient radiation protection, Radiography (London) 31 (2025), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2025.102932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2025.102932
G. G. Waade, A. Sanderud, and S. Hofvind, Compression force and radiation dose in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program, European Journal of Radiology 88 (2017) 41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.025
M. B. Williams et al., Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography, Medical Physics 35 (2008) 2414, https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2912177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2912177
K. P. Hermann et al., Optimizing full-field digital mammography techniques: The influence of target-filter and peak voltage settings on lesion detection and average glandular dose, In H. O. Peitgen, ed., Digital Mammography, pp. 177-178 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59327-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59327-7_24
21. S. M. Albeshan, A. A. Alhulail, and M. M. Almuqbil, Reporting average glandular dose and its associations with age and exposure parameters, Radiation Physics and Chemistry 223 (2024) 112004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112004
International Atomic Energy Agency, Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards (GSR Part 3) (International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, 2014)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 C. Querebalú García, P. E. Panizo Olivos, E. Garnique Millones, C. H. Barragan Mondragon, J. F. Márquez Pachas, E. B. Carrasco Solis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the Revista Mexicana de Física right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
